MAZA ranks #381 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #5411: 5030 of the 5410 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #381 |
| Rank counting claims | #5411 |
| Price | $0.00241 |
| Circulating supply | 0 MAZA |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Proof of Work |
| Consensus mechanism | SHA-256 + MinotaurX PoW + Hive |
| Own hashrate | — |
| Network purpose | Payments |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. MAZA's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 10 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 7.9 | group average, 8 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 6 | 3 of 5 points, 1 not yet measured source |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | – | |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✗ | 0 full years since its first recorded price, no halt, freeze or reversal in five years |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✗ | typical fee $3e-8; about 59 transactions a second, 3.9 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 8 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $2.4e-11 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | node software open source; light clients verify from headers or proofs |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 7.4 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $3e-8 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 3.9 | about 59 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 6.5 | a block every 1 minutes |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 10 | 4 MB limit, 38.5 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 6.7 | 2 of 3 passed |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | ✗ | Two-minute probabilistic blocks on a Litecoin Cash (Bitcoin Core 0.15/0.16) base that relays BIP125 opt-in replace-by-fee, with no double-spend proofs or instant locks. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✓ | MAZA 0.16.3 (Feb 2022): -prune keeps the UTXO set and recent blocks. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | MAZA 0.16.3 (Feb 2022) serves BIP37 Merkle proofs to SPV clients, which check the SHA-256/MinotaurX proof of work in headers. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | 6 | 4 of 6 points, 3 not yet measured source |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | – | |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | ✓ | 32% |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | ✓ | 45% |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | ✗ | 0 |
| Open source (Node software) | ✓ | Founder Payu Harris and volunteers maintain the MIT-licensed node in the MazaCoin GitHub organisation; MinotaurX and Hive were ported from Litecoin Cash. No company or foundation controls it. |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | ✗ | about 549 a day |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Decentralisation | 10 | section average, 4 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | 10 | No authority can halt the chain or freeze funds: No protocol-level party can freeze, blacklist or claw back coins or halt the chain. source |
| No central team (Source) | 10 | No central team: Founder Payu Harris and volunteers maintain the MIT-licensed node in the MazaCoin GitHub organisation; MinotaurX and Hive were ported from Litecoin Cash. No company or foundation controls it. source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | — | Not established. The code has no allocation (5,000 MAZA a block before height 100,000, then 1,000 halving every 950,000 blocks), but accounts of the 2014 launch describe reserves for the Lakota that would have been mined in the early 5,000-MAZA blocks, and they disagree: 10M (MIT Technology Review), 20M (P2P Foundation), 25M national reserve plus 25M tribal trust (Bitcoin Magazine), or half the supply (Wikipedia). 10M-50M would be 0.4-2.1% of today's 2.405B; no on-chain record of the reserve was found. |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. No cut in the block reward. Since the 2022 MinotaurX+Hive upgrade, bee-creation fees are burned and a bee buyer may optionally donate a share to a community fund address; that is a voluntary fee donation, not new issuance. source |
| Privacy | 4 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 4 | 2 of 5 passed source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | MAZA's Bitcoin-derived node (MazaCoin/maza) has no identity rule: anyone generates keys and receives and sends the coin. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | ✓ | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | MAZA 0.16.3 (Feb 2022): no Dandelion; Tor is only used if the operator runs and configures it. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Transparent Bitcoin-style amounts; no confidential transactions. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | Transparent addresses and inputs; no ring signatures or stealth addresses. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 3.3 | 3 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts (Scripting for spending conditions) | 1 | MAZA runs Bitcoin-style Script limited to spending conditions (signatures, hash locks, multisig); no contract VM or token introspection. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | OP_CHECKMULTISIG plus CLTV from BIP65Height 2,105,603 (the chain is at block 4,455,431) and a February 2022 BIP9 CSV deployment, per MAZA 0.16.3. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | HTLCs built from Script hash locks (OP_SHA256/OP_HASH160) with a CLTV refund branch are standard Script, so cross-chain hash-locked swaps work on MAZA. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange or order book in the MAZA consensus rules. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | MAZA nodes verify no other chain; no protocol-level cross-chain messaging. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | No token or NFT type in the MAZA consensus rules. |
| Supply & Demand | 0 | group average, 1 of 2 measured |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 0 | average of 1 measure |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 0 | no exchange the site reads trades it |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | – | no volume reported |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | not measured |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | – | not measured |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | — | Supply not reported |
| Record | 3.3 | group average |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 0 | 0 full years since 2026-04-16, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 0 | 0 positive, 7 negative source |
| Negative | ||
| Steady work, 0 of 6 | ✗ | 0 commits in 0 of the last 12 months (github.com/MazaCoin/maza); Last release MAZA 0.16.3, 2022-02-20 (MinotaurX + Hive 1.2); last commit 2022-01-13. No release in the last 24 months. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-03, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-52914: crafted orphan transactions can stall the node for hours in the uninterruptible orphan-resolution loop; still in MAZA v0.16.3. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-03, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2020-14198: misbehaving peers are auto-banned into an unbounded ban list, so many attacker addresses can exhaust CPU and memory; still in MAZA v0.16.3. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-31, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-52919: addr-message spam can overflow the address manager's 32-bit id counter and crash the node, with no addr rate limit; still in MAZA v0.16.3. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-09-18, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2019-25220: a long low-difficulty header chain can exhaust memory because the node has no headers pre-synchronisation; still in MAZA v0.16.3. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-10-08, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-35202: a crafted blocktxn message trips the assert in compact-block reconstruction and crashes the node; still in MAZA v0.16.3. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-05-05, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-52911: a crafted invalid block can make script-check threads read freed precomputed transaction data and crash the node; still in MAZA v0.16.3. |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
0 MAZA are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
Not established. The code has no allocation (5,000 MAZA a block before height 100,000, then 1,000 halving every 950,000 blocks), but accounts of the 2014 launch describe reserves for the Lakota that would have been mined in the early 5,000-MAZA blocks, and they disagree: 10M (MIT Technology Review), 20M (P2P Foundation), 25M national reserve plus 25M tribal trust (Bitcoin Magazine), or half the supply (Wikipedia). 10M-50M would be 0.4-2.1% of today's 2.405B; no on-chain record of the reserve was found.
No ICO or presale is documented; launched February 2014 by Payu Harris.
Not established; no sale is documented.
No cut in the block reward. Since the 2022 MinotaurX+Hive upgrade, bee-creation fees are burned and a bee buyer may optionally donate a share to a community fund address; that is a voluntary fee donation, not new issuance.
In 2014 founder Payu Harris presented MazaCoin as the Lakota Nation's official currency; Oglala Sioux Tribe President Bryan Brewer said that was 'not true at all' and that the council had not approved it (Indianz, 2014). That is a dispute over status, not a court or regulator finding, so falseClaims is left null. Clients is 0 because the node has had no release in 24 months.
Sources: github.com · github.com · mazacha.in · technologyreview.com · indianz.com. Researched 2026-10-26, low confidence.
No source we can reach publishes a hashrate for MAZA.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
MAZA is #381 among cryptocurrencies and #5411 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 5030 places between MAZA's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).