Mochimo ranks #193 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #1471: 1278 of the 1470 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 1705 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 75% are tokens, 20% are claims on other assets and 6% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | B · 65/100 · provisional |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #193 |
| Rank counting claims | #1471 |
| Market capitalisation | $3M |
| Price | $0.1050 |
| Circulating supply | 28,000,800 MCM |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Proof of Work |
| Consensus mechanism | Peach (memory-hard PoW, GPU) |
| Own hashrate | — |
| Network purpose | Payments |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
| Launch distribution | Premine |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
B — 65 out of 100, provisional (from 18 of 20 criteria, 28 October 2026 build). With what is not yet measured anywhere from nothing to full marks, the score would be 57 to 70 (C to B).
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 10 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 6.7 | group average, 10 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 7 | 3.5 of 5 points, 1 not yet measured source |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 4.9 | no fixed maximum; 28 million in circulation: supply scale 9.8, cap 0 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✓ | 6 full years since its first recorded price, no halt, freeze or reversal in five years |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | – | typical fee $2e-8 |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 9 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $1.1e-10 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | node software not open source; pruned nodes validate everything |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 6.6 | average of 3 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $2e-8 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 6.4 | a block every 59.8 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | 3.3 | 1 of 3 passed |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | ✗ | Probabilistic PoW confirmation with blocks of roughly 60-90 s; no instant locks or double-spend proofs. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✓ | ChainCrunch: a Neo Genesis block every 256 blocks holds the full ledger, so nodes sync from it plus recent blocks and block trailers and drop older blocks. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | No proof-verifying light client; wallets use nodes or the Mesh API. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | 3.1 | 2 of 6 points, 3 not yet measured source |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0.2 | about $1,207 a day |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | – | |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | ✗ | 1 |
| Open source (Node software) | ✗ | Adequate Systems (mochimodev and adequatesystems GitHub organisations) develops the only node; the code is under a custom 'MPL2.0 derivative' licence that restricts changes to those 'for the benefit of the Mochimo cryptocurrency network', a field-of-use limit that is not an OSI open-source licence. |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | ✓ | about 1,300 a day |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Decentralisation | 8 | section average, 6 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | 10 | No authority can halt the chain or freeze funds: No protocol-level freeze or blacklist key found in the node; consensus is proof of work. source |
| No central team (Source) | 0 | A central team directs it: Adequate Systems (mochimodev and adequatesystems GitHub organisations) develops the only node; the code is under a custom 'MPL2.0 derivative' licence that restricts changes to those 'for the benefit of the Mochimo cryptocurrency network', a field-of-use limit that is not an OSI open-source licence. source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 8.3 | 17% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. Premine 4.76M MCM (6.34% of the 76.53M design max): dev team compensation 3.2M plus 1.56M managed by the Mochimo Foundation. The rest is PoW-mined. Against the current supply of ~28.0M, that is 17.0%. source |
| Fundraising | 10 | No sale of the coin source |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. Block validation (bval.c) requires the header's mining reward to equal get_mreward(bnum) and credits it, with fees, to the block's mining address; there is no developer or foundation output. The 4.76M premine was a one-time genesis allocation. source |
| Privacy | 2 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2 | 1 of 5 passed source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Addresses are WOTS+ keys users generate; transactions are validated by signature, with no identity condition. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | ✗ | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | Nodes push transactions directly to peers; no Dandelion or Tor. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Ledger balances and transfers are public. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | One-time WOTS+ addresses are not stealth addresses and senders are public. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 0 | 0 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts | 0 | WOTS+ payment chain with plain and multi-destination transactions; no script or VM. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✗ | No multisig or time-locked transaction type in its definitions. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✗ | No hash-locked or time-locked transaction type. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange in the protocol. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | No cross-chain feature in the protocol. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | No token or NFT type in the protocol. |
| Supply & Demand | 5.6 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 1.4 | average of 3 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | – | exchanges not yet counted |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0 | $7,446 traded in 24 hours; #2636 by volume |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 3.1 | 0.25% of its market cap a day |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | no order book on the nine exchanges read |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 1.2 | $2.9M, 1.2 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 9.8 | no fixed maximum; 28 million in circulation |
| Record | 6.3 | group average |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 6 | 6 full years since 2020-05-10, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 3 | 2 positive, 4 negative source |
| Positive | ||
| Steady work, 6 of 6 | ✓ | 47 commits in 3 of the last 12 months (github.com/mochimodev/mochimo); Releases in the last 24 months: v3.0.0 (2025-01-25), v3.0.1, v3.0.2, v3.0.3 (2025-02-11) and v3.1.0-beta audit-remediation pre-release (2026-04-18). |
| Shipped a new capability for users in two years, +1 | ✓ | Mochimo v3.0.0, Feb 2025: standard transaction with up to 256 destinations each with a reference, perpetual account tags, transaction receipts via new Merkle roots. |
| Negative | ||
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-04-18, −1 | ✗ | Mochimo audit finding F-13 (no severity rating published): tx__init() leaves buffer offsets uninitialised for unsupported TXDAT/TXDSA types, a remotely triggerable memory-corruption vector; the fix ships only in the v3.1.0-beta pre-release, so the current stable v3.0.3 still has it. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-04-18, −1 | ✗ | Mochimo audit finding F-18 (no severity rating published): recv_file() puts no cap on OP_SEND_FILE streaming, so a malicious peer can fill a node's disk; the fix ships only in the v3.1.0-beta pre-release, so the current stable v3.0.3 still has it. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-04-18, −1 | ✗ | Mochimo audit finding F-29 (no severity rating published): get_ipl() accepts oversized peer-list responses, a peer-triggered DoS; the fix ships only in the v3.1.0-beta pre-release, so the current stable v3.0.3 still has it. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-04-18, −1 | ✗ | Mochimo audit finding F-07 (no severity rating published): a 64-bit balance overflow in ledger credit operations silently zeroes the account instead of rejecting the block; the fix ships only in the v3.1.0-beta pre-release, so the current stable v3.0.3 still has it. |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
28,000,800 MCM are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 17% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Sold by the issuer or insiders | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
| Fundraising | No sale and no investor round |
Premine 4.76M MCM (6.34% of the 76.53M design max): dev team compensation 3.2M plus 1.56M managed by the Mochimo Foundation. The rest is PoW-mined. Against the current supply of ~28.0M, that is 17.0%.
No ICO. Any market sales of the dev or Foundation premine are not documented.
Block validation (bval.c) requires the header's mining reward to equal get_mreward(bnum) and credits it, with fees, to the block's mining address; there is no developer or foundation output. The 4.76M premine was a one-time genesis allocation.
Aggregators show a 79.53M 'total supply', which is a design figure. Current supply is taken as ~28.0M per the site and Yahoo Finance. A community vote on moving to PoS is reported.
Sources: github.com · mochiwiki.com · mochimo.org · medium.com. Researched 2026-10-24, high confidence.
No source we can reach publishes a hashrate for Mochimo.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
Mochimo is #193 among cryptocurrencies and #1471 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 1278 places between Mochimo's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).