MimbleWimbleCoin ranks #340 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #4484: 4144 of the 4483 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #340 |
| Rank counting claims | #4484 |
| Price | $12.65 |
| Circulating supply | 0 MWC |
| Maximum supply | 20,000,000 MWC |
| Consensus family | Proof of Work |
| Consensus mechanism | Cuckatoo C31 (MimbleWimble) |
| Own hashrate | 9.66 kH/s |
| Network purpose | Payments |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. MimbleWimbleCoin's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 10 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 6.3 | group average, 9 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 8.3 | 5 of 6 points source |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 10 | fixed maximum supply of 20 million: supply scale 10, cap 10 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✓ | 6 full years since its first recorded price, no halt, freeze or reversal in five years |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✗ | typical fee $0.0001; about 15 transactions a second, 1.5 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 9 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $1.3e-8 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | node software open source; pruned nodes validate everything |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 5.9 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $0.0001 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 1.5 | about 14.5 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 6.4 | a block every 1 minute |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 8.5 | 1.37 MB limit (converted from its gas, compute, mass or count limit), 13.7 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 3.3 | 1 of 3 passed |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | ✗ | One-minute proof-of-work blocks with probabilistic confirmation; no instant-lock or double-spend-proof mechanism. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✓ | mwc-node runs non-archive by default (archive_mode off): spent outputs are pruned and nodes sync from a horizon snapshot. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | Mimblewimble chain with no SPV-style light client; wallets trust a node. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | 3.9 | 3 of 7 points, 2 not yet measured source |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | about $911 a day |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✓ | |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | ✗ | 1 |
| Open source (Node software) | ✓ | The only node, mwc-node (a Grin fork, Apache-2.0), is developed in the mwcproject GitHub organisation by the MWC team, which also sets the roadmap. |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | ✗ | about 327 a day |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Decentralisation | 6.2 | section average, 5 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | 10 | No authority can halt the chain or freeze funds: No protocol party can freeze, blacklist or claw back coins or halt the chain. source |
| No central team (Source) | 0 | A central team directs it: The only node, mwc-node (a Grin fork, Apache-2.0), is developed in the mwcproject GitHub organisation by the MWC team, which also sets the roadmap. source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 10 | Proof of work: 10 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 0.9 | 90.8% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. The genesis block pays GENESIS_BLOCK_REWARD = 10,000,000.04 MWC (consensus.rs); against ~11.02M supply at height 3,625,920 (schedule sum) that is 90.8%. Secondary sources say the 10M were split into about 6M for a Bitcoin-holder airdrop (about 5.4M actually claimed), about 2M for the developers and 2M for a HODL programme; all of it was allocated by the founders. source |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. consensus::reward pays block reward plus fees to the miner; no developer or treasury output. source |
| Privacy | 8 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 8 | 4 of 5 passed source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Mimblewimble outputs need only blinding keys anyone generates; no identity rule. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | ✓ | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✓ | mwc-node: Dandelion++ stem relay in the transaction pool, and since 6.0.1 (Mar 2026) an embedded Tor client carries all peer connections by default. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✓ | Mimblewimble since launch (2019): Pedersen commitments and range proofs hide every amount. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | No addresses on chain, but inputs are spent openly (no ring signatures or ZK sender hiding) and the graph is only partly hidden by cut-through. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 1.1 | 1 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts | 0 | Mimblewimble chain (Grin-derived mwc-node): outputs carry no scripts, only commitments and kernels. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✗ | Kernels carry lock heights and the wallet builds 2-of-2 Schnorr outputs for swaps, but there is no general m-of-n multisig in the protocol. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | mwc-wallet's swap module trades MWC against BTC, BCH, LTC, DASH, ZEC, DOGE and Ether with a multisig output and time-locked refund, working on mainnet. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | The swap marketplace is a wallet feature, not part of the consensus rules. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | MWC nodes verify no other chain; no protocol-level cross-chain messaging. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | Transactions carry only the native coin; no token or NFT type. |
| Supply & Demand | 5.5 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 0.9 | average of 1 measure |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | – | exchanges not yet counted |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0.9 | $27,620 traded in 24 hours; #2119 by volume |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | not measured |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | – | not measured |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 10 | fixed maximum supply of 20 million |
| Record | 8.3 | group average |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 6 | 6 full years since 2020-02-23, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 9 | 4 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive | ||
| Steady work, 6 of 6 | ✓ | 113 commits in 10 of the last 12 months (github.com/mwcproject/mwc-node); mwc-node 7.1.0 released 2026-08-25; 7.0.0 (2026-08-06), 6.0.1 (2026-03), 6.0.0 (2026-02) and 5.3.10 (2025-08) also in the last 24 months. |
| Shipped a security fix in two years, +1 | ✓ | mwc-node 6.0.1 (16 Mar 2026) shipped security updates to dependency crates; 7.0.0 (6 Aug 2026) and 7.1.0 (25 Aug 2026) addressed code-audit findings. |
| Shipped a privacy improvement in two years, +1 | ✓ | mwc-node 6.0.1 (16 Mar 2026): embedded Tor client used for all peer connections by default (encrypted P2P transport). |
| Shipped a scaling upgrade in two years, +1 | ✓ | mwc-node 5.3.9 (Jul 2025) lowered the default base fee to 0.000001 MWC per fee unit. |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
0 of a maximum 20,000,000 MWC are in circulation — 0.0% of the total that will ever exist.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 90.8% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
The genesis block pays GENESIS_BLOCK_REWARD = 10,000,000.04 MWC (consensus.rs); against ~11.02M supply at height 3,625,920 (schedule sum) that is 90.8%. Secondary sources say the 10M were split into about 6M for a Bitcoin-holder airdrop (about 5.4M actually claimed), about 2M for the developers and 2M for a HODL programme; all of it was allocated by the founders.
No ICO is reported; funding of the founding team and any sale of its 2M allocation are not documented in a primary source found.
No public or private sale is documented; whether the developer allocation was later sold is not documented.
consensus::reward pays block reward plus fees to the miner; no developer or treasury output.
The genesis 10M (half the 20M cap) dominates supply; the breakdown of airdrop, developer and HODL allocations comes from a secondary summary, not a primary document. Input circulating supply of 0 is wrong: the chain is live at height 3,625,920 with ~11.02M issued. No attack or halt found.
Sources: github.com · github.com · explorer.mwc.mw · yellow.com. Researched 2026-10-26, medium confidence.
MimbleWimbleCoin is secured by 9.66 kH/s of its own work. Hashrate does not compare across algorithms — a SHA-256 hash and a Scrypt hash cost different amounts to produce.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
MimbleWimbleCoin is #340 among cryptocurrencies and #4484 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 4144 places between MimbleWimbleCoin's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).