OC Protocol ranks #490 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #5621: 5131 of the 5620 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #490 |
| Rank counting claims | #5621 |
| Price | $0.00152 |
| Circulating supply | 0 OCP |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Hybrid |
| Consensus mechanism | SHA256T PoW + PoS |
| Own hashrate | — |
| Network purpose | Payments |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
| Launch distribution | No premine |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. Fewer than six of OC Protocol's nine network-security points are measured yet. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 4.5 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 4.5 | Hybrid: 4.5 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 4.5 | Hybrid: 4.5 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 6.8 | group average, 9 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 6 | 3 of 5 points, 1 not yet measured source |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | – | |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✓ | 6 full years since its first recorded price, no halt, freeze or reversal in five years |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✗ | about 30 transactions a second, 2.7 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 8 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $1.5e-11 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | node software open source; no light clients or pruned nodes |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 4.5 | average of 4 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 2.7 | about 29.5 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 8.9 | a block every 5 minutes |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 6.4 | 2 MB limit, 4 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 0 | 0 of 3 passed |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | ✗ | Ten-minute PoW and PoS targets (about 5 minutes combined) with probabilistic confirmation. |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): no -prune option; the node keeps the full block history. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): hybrid PoW/PoS chain; stake blocks cannot be checked from headers without the UTXO set and the protocol has no light-client proof scheme. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 2 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured source |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | – | |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | – | |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | ✗ | 0 |
| Open source (Node software) | ✓ | Single repository in the OC-CryptoCurrency GitHub organisation, though it describes the roadmap as community-led. |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | ✓ | |
| Decentralisation | 7.9 | section average, 6 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | 10 | No authority can halt the chain or freeze funds: No master checkpoint key or freeze function in the code. source |
| No central team (Source) | 0 | A central team directs it: Single repository in the OC-CryptoCurrency GitHub organisation, though it describes the roadmap as community-led. source |
| Who can mint (Source) | 7.1 | Hybrid: 7.1 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 10 | 0% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. Launched 2017-03-01; GetProofOfWorkReward pays nothing for blocks 0-499 (stated purpose: avoid a low-difficulty instamine), then 50 OCP to miners halving every 420,480 blocks; proof-of-stake blocks earn fees only. The README states no premine. source |
| Fundraising | 10 | No sale of the coin source |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. Whole PoW subsidy to the miner; PoS stakers receive transaction fees only. source |
| Privacy | 4 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 4 | 2 of 5 passed source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | OC Protocol's Bitcoin-derived node (OC-CryptoCurrency/OCP) has no identity rule: anyone generates keys and receives and sends the coin. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | ✓ | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): no Dandelion relay in the node; Tor is only an optional proxy setting (-tor/-onion) the user must configure. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): Bitcoin-style transparent outputs; no confidential amounts. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): Bitcoin-style transparent addresses; no ring signatures, zero-knowledge spends or stealth addresses. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 3.3 | 3 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts (Scripting for spending conditions) | 1 | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): Bitcoin-style Script limited to spending conditions; no contract platform. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): CHECKMULTISIG plus OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY enforced by the block-validation script flags (src/main.cpp), giving absolute time locks. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): hash-locked, CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY-refund HTLC scripts are expressible, as in Bitcoin. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): no order book or market maker in the ledger rules. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): no cross-chain message or light-client verification in the protocol. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | OCP 2.0 (Jul 2018; later commits only add checkpoints): no token or NFT type in the consensus rules. |
| Supply & Demand | 0 | group average, 1 of 2 measured |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 0 | average of 1 measure |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 0 | no exchange the site reads trades it |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | – | no volume reported |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | not measured |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | – | not measured |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | — | Supply not reported |
| Record | 5.3 | group average |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | 10 | 3 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| No claims by its founders that contradict its own design | ✓ | |
| No halt, freeze or reversal in five years | ✓ | |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 6 | 6 full years since 2020-09-22, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 0 | 1 positive, 4 negative source |
| Positive | ||
| Steady work, 1 of 6 | ✓ | 2 commits in 2 of the last 12 months (github.com/OC-CryptoCurrency/OCP); Last release 1.0.2 on 2018-07-26; later commits (to 2026-04-28) only edit the README and snapshots; ocprotocol.com now serves an unrelated gambling site and cryptoID dropped the OCP explorer. |
| Negative | ||
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-03, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-52914: crafted orphan transactions can stall the node for hours in the uninterruptible orphan-resolution loop; still in OC Protocol 1.0.2. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-03, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2020-14198: misbehaving peers are auto-banned into an unbounded ban list, so many attacker addresses can exhaust CPU and memory; still in OC Protocol 1.0.2. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-07-31, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2024-52919: addr-message spam can overflow the address manager's 32-bit id counter and crash the node, with no addr rate limit; still in OC Protocol 1.0.2. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2024-09-18, −1 | ✗ | CVE-2019-25220: a long low-difficulty header chain can exhaust memory because the node has no headers pre-synchronisation; still in OC Protocol 1.0.2. |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
0 OCP are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 0% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Sold by the issuer or insiders | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
| Fundraising | No sale and no investor round |
Launched 2017-03-01; GetProofOfWorkReward pays nothing for blocks 0-499 (stated purpose: avoid a low-difficulty instamine), then 50 OCP to miners halving every 420,480 blocks; proof-of-stake blocks earn fees only. The README states no premine.
None; Blackcoin fork launched as a 'cryptocurrency (social) experiment' via BitcoinTalk.
No sale documented.
Whole PoW subsidy to the miner; PoS stakers receive transaction fees only.
The OCP domain has lapsed to an unrelated operator; the README links three BitcoinTalk threads for later forks, which were not reviewed.
Sources: github.com · raw.githubusercontent.com · bitcointalk.org · coinmarketcap.com. Researched 2026-10-26, medium confidence.
No source we can reach publishes a hashrate for OC Protocol.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
OC Protocol is #490 among cryptocurrencies and #5621 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 5131 places between OC Protocol's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).