PLAYA3ULL GAMES ranks #277 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #2565: 2288 of the 2564 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 2829 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 81% are tokens, 16% are claims on other assets and 3% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #277 |
| Rank counting claims | #2565 |
| Market capitalisation | $297,518 |
| Price | $0.0000205 |
| Circulating supply | 14,486,663,082 3ULL |
| Maximum supply | 50,000,000,000 3ULL |
| Consensus family | Other |
| Consensus mechanism | Avalanche Snowman (subnet) |
| Network purpose | Gaming |
| Ledger type | Multi-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. PLAYA3ULL GAMES's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 6.4 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 6.4 | Other: 6.4 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 6.4 | Other: 6.4 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 4 | group average, 4 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 6.3 | 3.8 of 6 points |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 7.6 | fixed maximum supply of 50 billion: supply scale 5.2, cap 10 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✗ | 3 full years since its first recorded price, record not yet reviewed |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✓ | typical fee $2e-7; about 476 transactions a second, 7.3 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 18 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $2.1e-23 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | no light clients or pruned nodes |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 5.7 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $2e-7 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 7.3 | about 476 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 1.1 | a block every 2 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 10 | 1.25 MB limit (converted from its gas, compute, mass or count limit), 375 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 0 | 0 of 2 passed, 1 not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✗ | Subnet-EVM prunes state only; it has no option that deletes old blocks. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | Avalanche L1s have no light-client protocol; wallets use RPC. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 0 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | not mined |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Decentralisation | 1.4 | section average, 1 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | 1.4 | Other: 1.4 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | — | Not yet researched |
| Privacy | 2.5 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2.5 | 1 of 5 passed, 1 not yet measured source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Accounts are derived from user-generated keys and the EVM checks only signatures and balances; no identity check is part of the chain's rules. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | AvalancheGo gossip has no origin hiding. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Account-based EVM transfers; amounts are public. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | Plain account addresses; sender and receiver are public. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 1.1 | 1 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts | 0 | Subnet-EVM runs contracts, but the contract-deployer allow list has been active since genesis with a single admin address, so users cannot deploy their own. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✗ | No native multisig or time-lock; users cannot deploy multisig or timelock contracts under the deployer allow list. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✗ | Users cannot deploy HTLC contracts under the deployer allow list. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange in the protocol. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✓ | Avalanche Warp Messaging precompile active on the L1 (getBlockchainID answers at 0x0200…0005), with messages verified by validator BLS signatures. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | No native NFT type; only allow-listed accounts can deploy ERC-721 contracts. |
| Supply & Demand | 4.7 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 4.2 | average of 6 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 1 | 1 exchange |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0 | $9,581 traded in 24 hours; #3048 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 30, $2,539) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 4.3 | 0.42% of its market cap a day, median of the last 30 days |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | 9.7 | $2,487 within 2% of the price on 1 exchange, 0.84% of its market cap, median of the last 2 days |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 0 | $298K, 0 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | 10 | no futures, options or margin on the exchanges read |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 5.2 | fixed maximum supply of 50 billion |
| Record | 2.5 | group average, 2 of 3 measured |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 3 | 3 full years since 2023-06-02, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 2 | 2 positive, 0 negative source |
| Positive | ||
| Shipped a security fix in two years, +1 | ✓ | The L1's RPC reports AvalancheGo/subnet-EVM v1.15.0, so it took the 2025-2026 AvalancheGo releases, which carry security fixes; no 3ULL-specific advisory. |
| Shipped a new capability for users in two years, +1 | ✓ | Avalanche Etna upgrade for subnet-EVM L1s (16 Dec 2024) enabled the Cancun opcodes (transient storage, MCOPY) on L1s running current subnet-EVM. |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
14,486,663,082 of a maximum 50,000,000,000 3ULL are in circulation — 29.0% of the total that will ever exist.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
PLAYA3ULL GAMES is #277 among cryptocurrencies and #2565 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 2288 places between PLAYA3ULL GAMES's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).
See the 1 wrapped and staked claim on PLAYA3ULL GAMES →