CratD2C ranks #287 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #2649: 2362 of the 2648 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 2912 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 81% are tokens, 16% are claims on other assets and 3% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #287 |
| Rank counting claims | #2649 |
| Market capitalisation | $240,861 |
| Price | $0.00573 |
| Circulating supply | 42,000,000 CRAT |
| Maximum supply | 300,000,000 CRAT |
| Consensus family | Other |
| Consensus mechanism | — not yet curated |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. CratD2C's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | — | group average, 0 of 2 measured |
| Consensus: leader ladder | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Consensus: family ladder | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 5.5 | group average, 3 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 7.8 | 3.9 of 5 points, 1 not yet measured |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 9.3 | fixed maximum supply of 300 million: supply scale 8.5, cap 10 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✗ | 0 full years since its first recorded price, record not yet reviewed |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✓ | typical fee $0.0000032; about 9,928 transactions a second, 10 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 18 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $5.7e-21 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | – | |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 6.2 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $0.0000032 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 10 | about 9,928 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 1.1 | a block every 2.01 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 10 | 6.18 MB limit (converted from its gas, compute, mass or count limit), 1840 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 0 | 0 of 1 passed, 2 not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | – | Node software and its pruning options are not public; not established. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | No working light-client protocol: wallets read balances from RPC servers they must trust. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 0 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | not mined |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Decentralisation | — | section average, 0 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | — | Not yet researched |
| Privacy | 2.5 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2.5 | 1 of 5 passed, 1 not yet measured source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Accounts are derived from user-generated keys and the EVM checks only signatures and balances; no identity check is part of the chain's rules. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | No origin-hiding relay; the node gossips transactions over plain devp2p. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Account-based EVM transfers; amounts are public. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | Plain account addresses; sender and receiver are public. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 7.8 | 7 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance (At protocol level) | 2 | ERC-20 contracts on the CratD2C EVM chain (chain ID 2310), where tokens from several deployers appear on the explorer; no deployer restriction is documented. |
| Smart contracts (General-purpose) | 2 | EVM on the CratD2C chain (chain ID 2310), producing blocks on 2026-10-28, with tokens from several deployers on the explorer. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | m-of-n multisig and time-lock contracts (Safe-style wallets, timelock controllers) run on its EVM like on Ethereum. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | Hash-time-locked contracts are expressible in Solidity on its EVM, as in EVM HTLC swap implementations. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange in the protocol; DEXs on the chain are user-deployed contracts. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | No protocol-level cross-chain messaging. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✓ | ERC-721 contracts run on its EVM. |
| Supply & Demand | 5.9 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 3.3 | average of 3 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | – | exchanges not yet counted |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0.3 | $14,851 traded in 24 hours; #2398 by volume |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 9.5 | 6.2% of its market cap a day |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | no order book on the nine exchanges read |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 0 | $241K, 0 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 8.5 | fixed maximum supply of 300 million |
| Record | 0 | group average, 1 of 3 measured |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 0 | 0 full years since 2026-01-26, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
42,000,000 of a maximum 300,000,000 CRAT are in circulation — 14.0% of the total that will ever exist.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
CratD2C is #287 among cryptocurrencies and #2649 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 2362 places between CratD2C's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).