BitCanna ranks #485 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #5596: 5111 of the 5595 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #485 |
| Rank counting claims | #5596 |
| Price | $0.0000499 |
| Circulating supply | 0 BCNA |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Proof of Stake |
| Consensus mechanism | Tendermint (CometBFT) |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. BitCanna's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 9.1 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 6.4 | group average, 3 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | — | 3 of 3 points, 3 not yet measured |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | – | |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | – | 6 full years since its first recorded price, record not yet reviewed |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✓ | typical fee $1e-8; about 622 transactions a second, 7.7 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 6 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $5.0e-11 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | – | light clients verify from headers or proofs |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 8.1 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $1e-8 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 7.7 | about 622 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 2.7 | a block every 5.61 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 10 | 1.05 MB limit, 112 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 10 | 2 of 2 passed, 1 not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | ✓ | Cosmos SDK pruning ('default'/'everything') plus CometBFT min-retain-blocks and state sync let a node keep only recent state and blocks. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✓ | bcna v4.0.3 runs CometBFT 0.38.15, whose light client verifies headers from validator signatures. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 0 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | not mined |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Decentralisation | 8.6 | section average, 1 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | 8.6 | Proof of stake: 8.6 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | — | Not yet researched |
| Privacy | 2.5 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2.5 | 1 of 5 passed, 1 not yet measured source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Accounts are created from user-generated keys in the Cosmos SDK auth and bank modules, with no identity check on holding or sending. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | CometBFT gossips transactions without origin hiding; no Dandelion or built-in Tor. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Transparent bank-module transfers. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | Plain public bech32 accounts. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 2.2 | 2 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance | 0 | No token issuance on the chain itself |
| Smart contracts | 0 | CosmWasm arrived with the v4 upgrade, but code upload is limited to three team addresses and the only stored codes are two burn contracts, so users cannot program their own contracts. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | Cosmos SDK multisig keys and vesting accounts (x/auth/vesting) in the bcna app. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✗ | No HTLC module, and users cannot upload an HTLC contract. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange module in the bcna app. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✓ | IBC core, ICS-20 transfer and interchain accounts in the bcna app, with open IBC channels on mainnet. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✗ | No NFT module in the configured app modules and no NFT contract code stored. |
| Supply & Demand | 0 | group average, 1 of 2 measured |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 0 | average of 1 measure |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 0 | no exchange the site reads trades it |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | – | no volume reported |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | not measured |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | – | not measured |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | — | Supply not reported |
| Record | 3 | group average, 2 of 3 measured |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 6 | 6 full years since 2020-10-28, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 0 | 2 positive, 9 negative source |
| Positive | ||
| Shipped a security fix in two years, +1 | ✓ | bcna v4.0.2/v4.0.3, Dec 2024: security patches (wasmvm 2.1.4, x/crypto 0.31.0, Cosmos SDK 0.50.11 'security bug'). |
| Shipped a new capability for users in two years, +1 | ✓ | bcna v4.0.1 'stickyfingers' upgrade at height 16,782,000 (25 Nov 2024): CosmWasm smart contracts added (code upload allow-listed, instantiation open). |
| Negative | ||
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2026-01-23, −1 | ✗ | CometBFT CSA-2026-001 "Tachyon" (GHSA-c32p-wcqj-j677, Critical) lets a faulty validator push block timestamps forward; bcna v4.0.3 runs CometBFT v0.38.15, which has no fix. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-10-14, −1 | ✗ | CometBFT ASA-2025-003 (GHSA-hrhf-2vcr-ghch, High) lets a peer halt the network with a malformed BitArray; bcna v4.0.3 runs CometBFT v0.38.15, which has no fix. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-02-03, −1 | ✗ | CometBFT ASA-2025-002 (GHSA-r3r4-g7hq-pq4f, High) lets a malicious peer stall the network with valid-looking block parts; bcna v4.0.3 runs CometBFT v0.38.15, which has no fix. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-02-20, −1 | ✗ | Cosmos SDK ASA-2025-003 (GHSA-x5vx-95h7-rv4p, High) lets a malicious x/group proposal halt the chain; bcna v4.0.3 uses x/group on cosmos-sdk v0.50.11, without the fix (v0.47.16 / v0.50.12). |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-03-12, −1 | ✗ | Cosmos SDK ISA-2025-002 (GHSA-47ww-ff84-4jrg, High) lets x/group proposals halt the chain from EndBlocker; bcna v4.0.3 uses x/group on cosmos-sdk v0.50.11, without the fix (v0.47.17 / v0.50.13). |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-07-08, −1 | ✗ | Cosmos SDK ISA-2025-005 (GHSA-p22h-3m2v-cmgh, High) lets a deposit into a validator rewards pool overflow and halt the chain; bcna v4.0.3 is on cosmos-sdk v0.50.11, without the v0.50.14 fix. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-06-10, −1 | ✗ | CosmWasm CWA-2025-006 (GHSA-79xg-q4qm-7v9w, High) lets an IBC channel open even though the contract returned an error; bcna v4.0.3 uses wasmd v0.53.2, before the v0.53.3 fix. |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-02-27, −1 | ✗ | ibc-go ASA-2025-004 (GHSA-jg6f-48ff-5xrw, Critical) lets anyone who opens an IBC channel halt the chain through non-deterministic acknowledgement JSON; bcna v4.0.3 uses ibc-go v8.5.2, without the fix (v7.9.2 / v8.6.1). |
| Unfixed vulnerability, disclosed 2025-03-12, −1 | ✗ | ibc-go ISA-2025-001 (GHSA-4wf3-5qj9-368v, High) extends the same acknowledgement chain-halt to all IBC apps; bcna v4.0.3 uses ibc-go v8.5.2, without the fix (v7.10.0 / v8.7.0). |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
0 BCNA are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
BitCanna is #485 among cryptocurrencies and #5596 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 5111 places between BitCanna's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).