Splendor ranks #362 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #5144: 4782 of the 5143 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #362 |
| Rank counting claims | #5144 |
| Price | $0.1806 |
| Circulating supply | 0 SPLD |
| Maximum supply | 26,000,000,000 SPLD |
| Consensus family | Proof of Stake |
| Consensus mechanism | PoSA (Congress) |
| Network purpose | Smart-contract platform |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. Splendor's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 9.1 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 6.2 | group average, 4 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | 7.6 | 3.8 of 5 points, 1 not yet measured |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 7.9 | fixed maximum supply of 26 billion: supply scale 5.8, cap 10 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | ✗ | 1 full year since its first recorded price, record not yet reviewed |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | ✓ | typical fee $0.0000065; about 116,800 transactions a second, 10 on the throughput scale (5 is the busiest networks' median demand) |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 18 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $1.8e-19 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | – | |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | 6 | average of 5 parts source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $0.0000065 |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | 10 | about 116,800 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 0.2 | a block every 1.14 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 10 | 188 MB limit (converted from its gas, compute, mass or count limit), 98700 MB per 10 minutes |
| Features (3 checks) | 0 | 0 of 1 passed, 2 not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | – | The fork's base geth version is not public, so pruning could not be checked. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | ✗ | PoSA Congress chain: No sync-committee or finality-proof light client; wallets query RPC servers. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 0 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | not mined |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Decentralisation | 8.6 | section average, 1 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | 8.6 | Proof of stake: 8.6 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | — | Not yet researched |
| Privacy | 2.5 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2.5 | 1 of 5 passed, 1 not yet measured source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Open EVM accounts; no identity rule. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | Splendor node (Geth/v1.3.0-unstable fork, Go 1.17): devp2p transport without Dandelion or built-in Tor. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Account-based EVM with public balances; no confidential transfers. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | Public EVM accounts; no ring signatures, ZK sender privacy or stealth addresses. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 7.8 | 7 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance (At protocol level) | 2 | EVM chain (PoSA Congress) on which ERC-20 contracts are deployed; the explorer lists third-party ERC-20s such as TND and test stablecoins. |
| Smart contracts (General-purpose) | 2 | EVM-compatible PoSA (Congress) chain with full Solidity compatibility: any account deploys EVM (Solidity) contracts on mainnet. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | m-of-n multisig and time-locked spending are expressed as EVM contracts (Safe-style wallets, timelock contracts reading block.timestamp). |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | The EVM expresses HTLCs (sha256 preimage plus block.timestamp refund), so hash-locked cross-chain swaps work. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange in the protocol; any DEX is a user-deployed contract. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | No protocol-level cross-chain messaging verified by the chain's own nodes; any bridge is a third-party contract. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✓ | ERC-721 NFT contracts run on the chain's EVM. |
| Supply & Demand | 3.2 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 0.5 | average of 2 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 1 | 1 exchange |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0 | $127 traded in 24 hours; #3680 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 2, $292) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | – | not measured |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | not measured |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | – | not measured |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 5.8 | fixed maximum supply of 26 billion |
| Record | 1 | group average, 1 of 3 measured |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 1 | 1 full year since 2025-10-28, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
0 of a maximum 26,000,000,000 SPLD are in circulation — 0.0% of the total that will ever exist.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
Splendor is #362 among cryptocurrencies and #5144 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 4782 places between Splendor's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).