Everscale ranks #207 of 504 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #1633: 1426 of the 1632 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 1875 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 76% are tokens, 19% are claims on other assets and 5% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #207 |
| Rank counting claims | #1633 |
| Market capitalisation | $2M |
| Price | $0.00102 |
| Circulating supply | 1,985,523,482 EVER |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Proof of Stake |
| Consensus mechanism | SMFT (Soft Majority Fault Tolerance) |
| Network purpose | Smart-contract platform |
| Ledger type | Multi-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. Everscale's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 9.1 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 5.7 | group average, 4 of 12 measured |
| Sound Money Properties (6 checks) (Source) | — | 2.4 of 3 points, 3 not yet measured |
| Scarcity (Limited supply · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §6) | 3.7 | no fixed maximum; 1.99 billion in circulation: supply scale 7.4, cap 0 |
| Durability (Sustainability · 1 Store of value) | – | 6 full years since its first recorded price, record not yet reviewed |
| Fungibility (Interchangeability · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | every unit identical and worth any other |
| Portability (Scalability · 2 Medium of exchange) | – | |
| Divisibility (Flexibility · 3 Unit of account) | ✓ | 9 decimal places, the smallest unit worth $1.0e-12 |
| Verifiability (Authenticity check · 1 Store of value · Whitepaper §8) | – | |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | — | too few measures yet source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (2,478 a second, the busiest network's peak day, 10; 119, the median of the ten busiest, 5) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 0 | a block every 1 second |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (3 checks) | – | not yet researched |
| Fast payments (Safe to accept within seconds · Whitepaper §11) | – | |
| Pruned nodes (Old history dropped, every rule checked · Whitepaper §7) | – | Current mainnet node software not established. |
| Light clients (Payments verified from headers · Whitepaper §8) | – | TON-derived liteserver proofs exist, but the current mainnet node software was not established. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 0 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured |
| Miner pay (A day, $1,000 0 to $10 million 10; 2 points) | 0 | not mined |
| Own hashrate (Half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined) | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool (Pool or validator under 50%) | – | |
| Largest three (Under 75% together) | – | |
| Clients (More than one maintained) | – | |
| Open source (Node software) | – | |
| Real use (1,000+ transactions a day) | – | |
| No 51% attack (Nor a deep reorganisation, five years) | – | |
| Decentralisation | 6.7 | section average, 3 of 8 measured |
| Censorship resistant (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| No central team (Source) | — | Not yet researched |
| Who can mint (Source) | 8.6 | Proof of stake: 8.6 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 1.6 | 83.6% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. Free TON genesis (2020) 5B under the Declaration of Decentralization: 85% partnerships and adoption, 10% developers (paid via jury-judged contests), 5% validators. 3B was burned from the partnerships tranche in Nov 2021. Insider = 1.25B partnerships + 0.5B developers = 1.75B; the 5% validator pool is excluded. Against ~2.09B current total, that is 83.6%. source |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. No cut found. New EVER is minted only as validator/elector rewards; the 10% developer tranche (paid via contests) and the partnerships tranche were genesis allocations under the 2020 Declaration of Decentralization, not a share of issuance. source |
| Privacy | 2.5 | section average |
| Privacy (5 checks) | 2.5 | 1 of 5 passed, 1 not yet measured source |
| Protocol level privacy (Keys not tied to an identity · Whitepaper §10) | ✓ | Accounts are created from keys users generate themselves; transfers are validated by signature, with no identity condition in the protocol. |
| UTXO ledger (A new key for each payment · Whitepaper §2, §9) | – | |
| Network privacy (Origin hidden by default) | ✗ | Nodes relay external messages directly; no Dandelion or Tor. |
| Hidden amounts (Amounts confidential) | ✗ | Account balances and transfers are public. |
| Hidden parties (Sender and receiver hidden) | ✗ | Sender and receiver accounts are public. |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | 7.8 | 7 of 9 points source |
| Token issuance (At protocol level) | 2 | TVM smart contracts, open to any account, carry TIP-3 fungible tokens. |
| Smart contracts (General-purpose) | 2 | TVM smart contracts (TON-Solidity), open to any account. |
| Multisig and time locks (Without a third party) | ✓ | Standard SafeMultisig/SetcodeMultisig wallet contracts give m-of-n signing, and TVM contracts can check block time. |
| Atomic swaps (With other chains) | ✓ | TVM contracts can express hash-locked, time-locked escrow. |
| Native exchange (Built into the protocol) | ✗ | No exchange in the protocol; FlatQube is a contract DEX. |
| Cross-chain messaging (Verified by the chain itself) | ✗ | Octus Bridge relies on relayers staking and signing, not verification by Everscale validators. |
| NFTs (Carried by the chain's rules) | ✓ | TIP-4 NFT contract standard on TVM. |
| Supply & Demand | 5.2 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 3 | average of 6 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 1 | 1 exchange |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 0 | $3,619 traded in 24 hours; #2948 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (scored on the median day of the last 30, $3,590) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 1.8 | 0.14% of its market cap a day, median of the last 30 days |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | 4.6 | $495 within 2% of the price on 1 exchange, 0.02% of its market cap, median of the last 2 days |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 0.8 | $2.0M, 0.8 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | 10 | no futures, options or margin on the exchanges read |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 7.4 | no fixed maximum; 1.99 billion in circulation |
| Record | 6 | group average, 1 of 3 measured |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 6 | 6 full years since 2020-10-26, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
Twenty criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have five sections: sound money (six qualities: scarcity, durability, fungibility, portability, divisibility, verifiability), scalability (four measures and three features), security (miner pay and seven checks), decentralisation (censorship resistance, no central team, who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share) and privacy (five checks); programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) follows them. Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
1,985,523,482 EVER are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 83.6% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
Free TON genesis (2020) 5B under the Declaration of Decentralization: 85% partnerships and adoption, 10% developers (paid via jury-judged contests), 5% validators. 3B was burned from the partnerships tranche in Nov 2021. Insider = 1.25B partnerships + 0.5B developers = 1.75B; the 5% validator pool is excluded. Against ~2.09B current total, that is 83.6%.
No public or private sale documented. Distribution was via contests and partnership grants decided by the founding companies and jury.
No cut found. New EVER is minted only as validator/elector rewards; the 10% developer tranche (paid via contests) and the partnerships tranche were genesis allocations under the 2020 Declaration of Decentralization, not a share of issuance.
The 85/10/5 split and the 3B burn come from secondary sources; no primary genesis file was read. Current total supply is from an aggregator (~2.09B; site circulating 1.99B).
Sources: everscale.network · docs.everscale.network · everscale.network · forklog.com · iq.wiki · api.coinpaprika.com. Researched 2026-10-24, low confidence.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
Everscale is #207 among cryptocurrencies and #1633 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 1426 places between Everscale's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).