LTO Network ranks #204 of 508 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #1195: 991 of the 1194 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 1721 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 75% are tokens, 20% are claims on other assets and 6% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | pending — launch under review |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #204 |
| Rank counting claims | #1195 |
| Market capitalisation | $3M |
| Price | $0.00644 |
| Maximum supply | 500,000,000 LTO |
| Consensus family | Other |
| Consensus mechanism | — not yet curated |
| Ledger type | Single-asset ledger |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
Grade pending. LTO Network's launch — how much went to insiders, whether it was sold to investors — is still being researched. A grade is not given until it is, so that a coin is never rated higher for what is not yet known.
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | — | group average, 0 of 2 measured |
| Consensus: leader ladder | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Consensus: family ladder | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Cryptocurrency Standards (Source) | 0 | group average, 1 of 11 measured |
| Basic list (4 checks) | — | 1 of 4 passed, 3 not yet measured |
| Limited supply | ✓ | fixed maximum of 500,000,000 |
| No authority that can halt the chain or freeze funds | – | |
| No central team | – | |
| UTXO ledger | – | |
| Privacy (3 checks) | 0 | 0 of 3 passed source |
| Network-level privacy: the node hides where a transaction came from (Dandelion++, Tor or I2P, on by default) | ✗ | Waves-derived node broadcasts transactions directly; no Dandelion or Tor. |
| Hidden amounts (confidential transactions, RingCT, shielded pools, Mimblewimble) | ✗ | Balances and transfers are public. |
| Hidden sender and receiver (ring signatures or zero-knowledge proofs, one-time or stealth addresses) | ✗ | Sender and receiver addresses are public. |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space, features) | — | too few measures yet source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | – | not yet measured |
| Throughput (1,000 transactions a second or more 10) | – | not yet measured |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | – | not yet measured |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | – | not yet measured |
| Features (4 checks) | 0 | 0 of 2 passed, 2 not yet researched |
| Payments safe to accept within seconds | – | |
| Native payment channels or instant payments | ✗ | No payment-channel or instant-payment feature. |
| Pruned nodes: a full node can validate and drop old history | – | No pruning option documented for lto-public-chain. |
| Light clients verify payments from headers or proofs, without a trusted server | ✗ | No proof-based light client; wallets use node APIs. |
| Security (miner pay and 7 checks) | — | 0 of 3 points, 6 not yet measured |
| Miners paid a day ($1,000 0, $10 million or more 10), 2 points | 0 | not mined |
| Its own hashrate: at least half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool or validator under 50% | – | |
| Largest three under 75% | – | |
| More than one maintained client | – | |
| Node software is open source | – | |
| Real on-chain use: 1,000+ transactions a day | – | |
| No 51% attack or deep reorganisation in five years | – | |
| Programmability (tokens, contracts, 5 checks) | — | 0 of 2 points, 7 not yet researched |
| Token issuance | 0 | No user token issuance on its L1, which anchors hashes and runs transfers, leasing and non-Turing-complete smart accounts; Ownables run off-chain in wallets, and the L1 is being shut down as the project moves to Base as EQTY. |
| Smart contracts | – | LTO Network's documentation says the network is shutting down, with the token moved to EQTY on Base since November 2025, and its public node API did not answer in October 2026, so no live L1 could be assessed. |
| Multisig and time locks | – | Not established: the L1 is being shut down and no live node could be queried. |
| Atomic swaps with other chains | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| An exchange built into the protocol | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| Cross-chain messaging the chain verifies itself | – | Not established for the same reason. |
| Non-fungible tokens | – | Not established for the same reason; Ownables run in wallets, not on L1 nodes. |
| Decentralisation | — | section average, 0 of 6 measured |
| Who can mint (Source) | — | Consensus not yet reviewed |
| Nodes (Source) | — | Not yet counted |
| Holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Fundraising | — | Launch not yet researched |
| Developer share (after launch) | — | Not yet researched |
| Supply & Demand | 5.5 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 3.2 | average of 3 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | – | exchanges not yet counted |
| Daily volume ($10K 0, $1B or more 10) | 1.2 | $41,526 traded in 24 hours; #1963 by volume |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 7.2 | 1.5% of its market cap a day |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | – | no order book on the nine exchanges read |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 1.1 | $2.8M, 1.1 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Paper trading (futures, options and margin ÷ market cap, 0%: 10, 100%: 0) | – | not measured |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 7.7 | fixed maximum supply of 500 million |
| Record | — | group average, 0 of 3 measured |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | — | Not yet reviewed |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | — | Genesis date not yet researched |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | — | Not yet measured: no commit count and no release research |
Eighteen criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards have six sections: the basic list (four checks drawn from the Bitcoin whitepaper), privacy (three checks), scalability (four measures and four features), security (miner pay and seven checks), programmability (token issuance, smart contracts and five checks) and decentralisation (who can mint, nodes, holders, premine, fundraising and developer share). Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
Circulating supply is not published by our source.
No SEC/CFTC determination — unclassified.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
LTO Network is #204 among cryptocurrencies and #1195 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 991 places between LTO Network's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).