Terra Luna Classic ranks #49 of 508 cryptocurrencies. On a list that also counts tokens, memecoins, wrapped coins, staked derivatives and stablecoins it appears at #155: 106 of the 154 assets ahead of it are not native coins but tokens or claims. A token is issued on a host blockchain rather than running its own; a claim stands for an asset already counted. Of the 148 non-native assets CoinSpectrum lists above it by market cap, about 53% are claims on other assets, 40% are tokens and 7% are memecoins.
| CoinSpectrum Grade | C · 57/100 · provisional |
|---|---|
| Rank among cryptocurrencies | #49 |
| Rank counting claims | #155 |
| Market capitalisation | $250M |
| Price | $0.0000454 |
| Circulating supply | 5,512,247,645,396 LUNC |
| Maximum supply | no fixed cap |
| Consensus family | Proof of Stake |
| Consensus mechanism | Tendermint (CometBFT) |
| Network purpose | Smart-contract platform |
| Ledger type | Multi-asset ledger |
| Launch distribution | Presale |
| Regulatory class | Security |
Market figures from the 28 October 2026 build. Open the live view for every exchange's price, and charts.
C — 57 out of 100, provisional (from 16 of 17 criteria, 28 October 2026 build). With what is not yet measured anywhere from nothing to full marks, the score would be 53 to 60 (C to C).
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Consensus Mechanisms (Source) | 9.1 | group average |
| Consensus: leader ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of consensus families ranked by their largest chain's market cap |
| Consensus: family ladder | 9.1 | Proof of stake: 9.1 of 10 on the ladder of families ranked by the combined market cap of their chains |
| Cryptocurrency Standards | 6.1 | group average, 5 of 6 measured |
| Properties (10 whitepaper checks) (Source) | 3 | 3 of 10 passed source |
| Anyone can mint (permissionless) | ✗ | Tendermint (CometBFT) |
| Limited supply | ✗ | an issuer or vote can mint outside the schedule |
| No pre-issuance or developer mint | ✗ | |
| No developer tax | ✓ | |
| No authority that can halt the chain or freeze funds | ✗ | Validators halted the chain twice in May 2022 during the UST collapse, at Terraform Labs' request. |
| No central team | ✓ | Since Terraform Labs left the chain in 2022, the classic core has been maintained by community developer groups funded through community-pool proposals. |
| Fees under one cent | ✓ | typical fee $0.00013 |
| Payments safe to accept within seconds | ✗ | CometBFT single-block finality, but blocks average about 5.9 s. |
| UTXO ledger | ✗ | |
| Privacy built into the protocol | ✗ | |
| Scalability (fees, throughput, block time, block space) | 7.6 | average of 4 measures source |
| Fees ($0.001 or less 10, $1 or more 0) | 10 | typical fee $0.00013 |
| Throughput (1,000 transactions a second or more 10) | 7.7 | about 211 simple transactions a second |
| Block time (10 minutes 10, less either side) | 2.8 | a block every 5.92 seconds |
| Block space per 10 minutes (32 MB or more 10) | 10 | 2 MB limit, 203 MB per 10 minutes |
| Security (9 checks) | 5 | 5 of 9 passed source |
| Miners paid over $1 million a day | ✗ | not mined |
| Miners paid over $100,000 a day | ✗ | |
| Its own hashrate: at least half its algorithm's largest, not merge-mined | ✗ | not mined |
| Largest pool or validator under 50% | ✓ | 9.73% |
| Largest three under 75% | ✓ | 23.97% |
| More than one maintained client | ✗ | 1 |
| Node software is open source | ✓ | Since Terraform Labs left the chain in 2022, the classic core has been maintained by community developer groups funded through community-pool proposals. |
| Real on-chain use: 1,000+ transactions a day | ✓ | about 4,432 a day |
| No 51% attack or deep reorganisation in five years | ✓ | |
| Decentralisation: who can mint (Source) | 8.6 | Proof of stake: 8.6 of 10 on the ladder of who produces blocks |
| Decentralisation: nodes (Source) | 6.5 | 90 active validators or block producers (source: terra-classic-lcd.publicnode.com) |
| Decentralisation: holder concentration (Source) | — | Not yet measured |
| Capabilities (protocol features) | 3.3 | 2 of 6 passed source |
| Decentralisation | ||
| Network-level privacy: the node hides where a transaction came from (Dandelion++, Tor or I2P, on by default) | ✗ | CometBFT mempool gossip relays transactions directly. |
| Light clients verify payments from headers or proofs, without a trusted server | ✓ | CometBFT light client verifies headers from validator signatures. |
| Scalability | ||
| Pruned nodes: a full node can validate and drop old history | ✓ | Cosmos SDK pruning strategies plus min-retain-blocks. |
| Native payment channels or instant payments | ✗ | No payment channels. |
| Security | ||
| Hidden amounts (confidential transactions, RingCT, shielded pools, Mimblewimble) | ✗ | No confidential transactions. |
| Hidden sender and receiver (ring signatures or zero-knowledge proofs, one-time or stealth addresses) | ✗ | No sender or receiver hiding. |
| Issuance | 3.3 | group average |
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 0 | 100% of today's supply allocated at launch to founders, a company, a foundation or investors. Measured against the supply before the May 2022 collapse: the original 1B LUNA were allocated at genesis; the hyperinflation that followed diluted, but did not distribute, them. source |
| Fundraising | 0 | Sold by its issuer or insiders: 100% of supply was theirs to sell, 0% sold so far. Terraform Labs sold LUNA from the 1B genesis supply: the 2018 private sales (~$32M, often at 40%+ discounts), the July 2021 $150M ecosystem-fund sale, and LFG's Feb 2022 $1B LUNA sale to Jump/Three Arrows. Units for each are not fully disclosed, but even all 1B genesis LUNA against today's ~6.45T LUNC total supply (May-Jul 2026) is 0.02%, so the share rounds to 0.0. On the pre-collapse 1B basis used for preminePct, the 2018 backer allocation alone was about 26%. Terraform Labs raised $32M in 2018 by selling LUNA to investors (per the SEC complaint; exchanges such as Binance, Huobi, OKEx reported as backers), with discounted purchase agreements; a further $150M ecosystem-fund LUNA sale in July 2021 (Arrington XRP Capital, Pantera, Galaxy Digital, BlockTower). source |
| Developer share (after launch) | 10 | No developer share: every new coin goes to the miners or validators who produce blocks. Terra Classic's x/mint inflation is 0 (min = max = 0); new LUNA arises only from market-module swaps, which go to the swapper. The 50% community_tax applies to fees and the burn tax, not issuance. Before May 2022, part of swap seigniorage was re-minted to oracle rewards and the community pool; that was not quantified but is negligible against today's multi-trillion supply. source |
| Supply & Demand | 2.7 | group average |
| Supply & Demand (Source) | 5.4 | average of 6 measures |
| Exchanges (10 or more: 10) | 10 | 33 exchanges |
| Volume rank among the top 200 | 0 | $1,072,103 traded in 24 hours; #526 by volume on the exchanges the site reads (ranked on the median day of the last 30, $1,580,331) |
| Turnover (volume ÷ market cap, 5% a day: 10) | 5.1 | 0.59% of its market cap a day, median of the last 30 days |
| Order-book depth (bids and asks within 2% ÷ market cap, 1%: 10) | 7.3 | $389,611 within 2% of the price on 6 exchanges, 0.16% of its market cap, median of the last 2 days |
| Market cap ($1M 0, $10B or more 10) | 6 | $250M, 6 on a scale of 2.5 points per tenfold |
| Futures exposure (open interest ÷ market cap, less is better) | 4 | perpetual open interest 8.0% of its market cap |
| Supply (smaller is better) | 0 | no fixed maximum; 5.51 trillion in circulation |
| Record | 7.7 | group average |
| Record (origin, claims, halts) | 8 | 1 positive, 3 negative source |
| Positive record | ||
| Launched with a stated purpose, not as a joke | ✓ | |
| Negative record | ||
| Claims by its founders or lead company that contradict its own design | ✗ | In SEC v. Terraform Labs the jury (5 Apr 2024) found Terraform and Do Kwon liable for fraud, including misleading investors that the Chai payments app ran on the Terra blockchain and that UST's 2021 re-peg came from the algorithm rather than a secret Jump Trading intervention; Kwon admitted the latter in his Aug 2025 guilty plea. |
| Halt, freeze or reversal, 2022-05-12 | ✗ | Validators halted the chain at block 7,603,700 for about 2 hours during the UST/LUNA collapse to prevent governance attacks. |
| Halt, freeze or reversal, 2022-05-12 | ✗ | A second validator-coordinated halt the same day lasted roughly 9 hours; on restart validators disabled delegations, swaps and IBC. |
| Age (years since genesis) (Source) | 7 | 7 full years since 2019-07-26, the first day with a recorded price (genesis not yet researched, so the age can only be understated). |
| Development (work, improvements, unfixed issues) | 8 | 2 positive, 0 negative, 3 not yet researched source |
| Positive | ||
| Steady work, 6 of 6 | ✓ | 83 commits in 11 of the last 12 months (github.com/classic-terra/core); classic-terra/core v4.1.1, released 2026-10-12. |
| Token issuance at protocol level, validated by its own nodes, +2 | ✓ | CW-20 contracts on CosmWasm: any account can instantiate token contracts from code already on chain (instantiate permission Everybody), though uploading new code now needs governance (code_upload_access Nobody). |
| Not yet researched | ||
| Shipped a security fix in two years | – | |
| Shipped a scaling upgrade in two years | – | |
| Shipped a new capability for users in two years | – | |
Seventeen criteria, weighted equally. The Cryptocurrency Standards group four parts: properties (ten checks drawn from the Bitcoin whitepaper), scalability (four measures), security (nine checks) and decentralisation (three scales). Provisional: criteria marked — are not yet measured and are left out of the average. A rating of structure and market depth, not a price forecast or investment advice. How the grade is built · Highest-graded cryptocurrencies.
5,512,247,645,396 LUNC are in circulation, against no fixed cap — issuance has no defined end.
| Premine (allocated at launch) | 100% of today's supply |
|---|---|
| Sold by the issuer or insiders | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share received since launch | 0% of today's supply |
| Developer share of new coins today | 0% |
| Nodes or validators | 90 |
| Fundraising | Private or venture funding |
Measured against the supply before the May 2022 collapse: the original 1B LUNA were allocated at genesis; the hyperinflation that followed diluted, but did not distribute, them.
Terraform Labs raised $32M in 2018 by selling LUNA to investors (per the SEC complaint; exchanges such as Binance, Huobi, OKEx reported as backers), with discounted purchase agreements; a further $150M ecosystem-fund LUNA sale in July 2021 (Arrington XRP Capital, Pantera, Galaxy Digital, BlockTower).
Terraform Labs sold LUNA from the 1B genesis supply: the 2018 private sales (~$32M, often at 40%+ discounts), the July 2021 $150M ecosystem-fund sale, and LFG's Feb 2022 $1B LUNA sale to Jump/Three Arrows. Units for each are not fully disclosed, but even all 1B genesis LUNA against today's ~6.45T LUNC total supply (May-Jul 2026) is 0.02%, so the share rounds to 0.0. On the pre-collapse 1B basis used for preminePct, the 2018 backer allocation alone was about 26%.
Terra Classic's x/mint inflation is 0 (min = max = 0); new LUNA arises only from market-module swaps, which go to the swapper. The 50% community_tax applies to fees and the burn tax, not issuance. Before May 2022, part of swap seigniorage was re-minted to oracle rewards and the community pool; that was not quantified but is negligible against today's multi-trillion supply.
Sources: nysd.uscourts.gov · sec.gov · dev.to · rest.cosmos.directory · rest.cosmos.directory · hackernoon.com. Researched 2026-10-24, medium confidence.
Held a security (an investment contract) in SEC v. Terraform Labs, S.D.N.Y.: summary judgment of 28 December 2023, final judgment entered June 2024. The judgment covers the original LUNA, renamed LUNC (Terra Classic) in May 2022, and rejected splitting exchange buyers from direct ones.
The regulator's position, reported as stated, not CoinSpectrum's. Assets nobody has ruled on are left unclassified rather than sorted by a guess.
Terra Luna Classic is #49 among cryptocurrencies and #155 in the market ranking, which lists wrapped coins, staked derivatives, stablecoins and tokens alongside them. CoinSpectrum counts an asset once, and counts only cryptocurrencies: assets with their own blockchain and their own consensus. A wrapped coin, a staked derivative or a stablecoin is a claim on something already counted; a token, memecoin or otherwise, runs on another chain's blocks. All of them are listed, each in its own section, and none is added to the total. The 106 places between Terra Luna Classic's two ranks are held by claims and tokens, not by other networks. The methodology sets out the rule and the counting rule argues for it.
The price above is the median of the exchanges the site reads live, checked every minute and cross-checked against a market snapshot (how market data is gathered). The grade is scored on published criteria, each with its source (the method). The site is independent, nothing on it is a paid placement, and its statements are signed (about CoinSpectrum, the manifesto).
See the 1 wrapped and staked claim on Terra Luna Classic →